Archaeology and the New Testament
June 5, 2010 8:42 am apologetics, archaeology Lee Strobel in his book, The Case For Christ, sets forth the evidence for the truth about the life of Christ, i.e. His death, burial and resurrection. Strobel gives the results of thirteen interviews from a variety of biblical scholars each proficient in their respective fields of study. One of the interviews was with John McRay who specializes in biblical archaeology. This interview focused on the archaeological support for the accuracy of the New Testament documents. Strobel writes, “One promient archaeologist carefully examined Luke’s references to thirty-two countries, fifty-four cities, and nine islands, finding not a single mistake” (Strobel, p. 98 (quoting from Geisler and Howe, When Critics Ask, 385).
Contrast this fact with the Book of Mormon. Archaeology has repeatedly failed to substantiate the claims of the Book of Mormon. No Book of Mormon cities have ever been located. No Book of Mormon persons, places, nations or names have ever been found. No Book of Mormon artifacts have ever been found. No Book of Mormon inscriptions have ever been found. Nothing which demonstrates the Book of Mormon is anything other than myth or invention has ever been found (Strobel, p. 107).
This is an amazing contrast. Where the New Testament can be tested for accuracy, archaeology has verified its contents. Whereas, the Book of Mormon has no archaeological support. The New Testament is clearly established as being truthful. The Book of Mormon is merely myth!